Current:Home > StocksKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Elevate Capital Network
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-18 18:54:08
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (82)
Related
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Prince Louis Makes First Official Royal Engagement After Absence From Coronation Concert
- What we know about Ajike AJ Owens, the Florida mom fatally shot through a neighbor's door
- Former Trump attorney Timothy Parlatore thinks Trump could be indicted in Florida
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Fracking Study Finds Toxins in Wyoming Town’s Groundwater and Raises Broader Concerns
- Tupac Shakur posthumously receives star on Hollywood Walk of Fame
- Can a Climate Conscious Diet Include Meat or Dairy?
- Golf's No. 1 Nelly Korda looking to regain her form – and her spot on the Olympic podium
- Today’s Climate: July 27, 2010
Ranking
- A steeplechase record at the 2024 Paris Olympics. Then a proposal. (He said yes.)
- Pat Robertson, broadcaster who helped make religion central to GOP politics, dies at age 93
- New York, Philadelphia and Washington teams postpone games because of smoke coming from Canadian wildfires
- 18 Slitty Dresses Under $60 That Are Worth Shaving Your Legs For
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- You’ll Flip Over Simone Biles’ Second Wedding to Jonathan Owens in Mexico
- Arctic Heat Surges Again, and Studies Are Finding Climate Change Connections
- Wildfire smoke-laden haze could hang around Northeast and beyond for days, experts warn
Recommendation
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
Today’s Climate: July 13, 2010
Kids Challenge Alaska’s Climate Paradox: The State Promotes Oil as Global Warming Wreaks Havoc
Today’s Climate: July 24-25, 2010
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Nick Cannon Calls Out Deadbeat Dad Claims as He Shares How Much Money He Makes in a Year
Brain Cells In A Dish Play Pong And Other Brain Adventures
How Big Oil Blocked the Nation’s Greenest Governor on Climate Change